From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benn v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
May 29, 2018
554 S.W.3d 463 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

WD 80307

05-29-2018

Mitchel Dean BENN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Lara M. Guscott and Annette Wallace, Assistant Appellate Defenders, Kansas City, MO, Attorneys for Appellant. Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Gregory L. Barnes, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.


Lara M. Guscott and Annette Wallace, Assistant Appellate Defenders, Kansas City, MO, Attorneys for Appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Gregory L. Barnes, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Before Division Two: Karen King Mitchell, Presiding Judge, and Alok Ahuja and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judges

Order

Per Curiam:

Mitchel Benn appeals, following an evidentiary hearing, the denial of his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, in which he argued that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to seek suppression of Benn’s statement to Stephanie Kissick, a children’s service worker with the Carroll County Children’s Division, and for failing to object to Kissick’s testimony about his statement to her. Finding no clear error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Benn v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
May 29, 2018
554 S.W.3d 463 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Benn v. State

Case Details

Full title:Mitchel Dean BENN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: May 29, 2018

Citations

554 S.W.3d 463 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)