From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benn v. Lucca

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 24, 2021
2:21-cv-00667-CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00667-CKD P

08-24-2021

BRUCE KENDALL BENN, Plaintiff, v. A. LUCCA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

By order filed July 14, 2021, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order. Plaintiff has consented to this court's jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Local Rule 302.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign this matter to a district court judge.

IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Benn v. Lucca

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 24, 2021
2:21-cv-00667-CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2021)
Case details for

Benn v. Lucca

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE KENDALL BENN, Plaintiff, v. A. LUCCA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 24, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-00667-CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2021)