Summary
dismissing claim because the plaintiff made "no allegation in his amended complaint that he suffered any injury whatever as the result of the meals he has received in prison."
Summary of this case from Canterbury v. W. Reg'l Jail Auth.Opinion
No. 09-6458.
Submitted: May 28, 2009.
Decided: June 8, 2009.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00836-JCC-TRJ).
Anthony Benjamin, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Anthony Benjamin appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Benjamin v. Higgs, No. 1:08-cv-00836-JCC-TRJ, 2009 WL 483149 (E.D.Va. Feb. 25, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.