From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benjamin v. Taylor

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Sep 24, 2007
9:05-CV-0902 (LEK/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 24, 2007)

Opinion

9:05-CV-0902 (LEK/DEP).

September 24, 2007


DECISION AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on April 6, 2007 by the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3 of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 21). After ten days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the entire file to the undersigned, including the objection and supplemental objection by James Benjamin, which were filed on April 12, 2007 and April 16, 2007, respectively. Objections (Dkt. Nos. 22, 23).

It is the duty of this Court to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). "A [district] judge . . . may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." Id. This Court has considered the objections and has undertaken a de novo review of the record and has determined that the Report-Recommendation should be approved for the reasons stated therein.

Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 21) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further

ORDERED, that Petitioner's petition in this matter (Dkt. No. 1) be DENIED and DISMISSED in all respects; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Benjamin v. Taylor

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Sep 24, 2007
9:05-CV-0902 (LEK/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 24, 2007)
Case details for

Benjamin v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:JAMES BENJAMIN, Petitioner, v. JUSTIN TAYLOR, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Sep 24, 2007

Citations

9:05-CV-0902 (LEK/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 24, 2007)

Citing Cases

Plater v. Superintendent

"The chief purposes of the exhaustion doctrine would be frustrated if the federal habeas court were to rule…

Chase v. Wolcott

Therefore, the Court finds no clear error in Magistrate Judge Dancks' recommendation that the petition be…