From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benjamin v. Kurnick

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 14, 1928
141 A. 919 (N.J. 1928)

Opinion

Submitted February 17, 1928 —

Decided May 14, 1928.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 5 N.J. Mis. R. 1095.

For the respondent, Kalisch Kalisch.

For the appellant, Frank G. Turner.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Benjamin v. Kurnick

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 14, 1928
141 A. 919 (N.J. 1928)
Case details for

Benjamin v. Kurnick

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD BENJAMIN, RESPONDENT, v. MAX KURNICK, APPELLANT

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 14, 1928

Citations

141 A. 919 (N.J. 1928)
141 A. 919

Citing Cases

Bernstein Furniture Co. v. Kelly

The Common Pleas Court further held that, under the proofs of the instant case, the chronic condition of…