From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benjamin v. Johnson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 18, 2011
411 F. App'x 630 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-7285.

Submitted: February 10, 2011.

Decided: February 18, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Douglas E. Miller, Magistrate Judge. (2:10-cv-00043-DEM).

Gina Montez Benjamin, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Gina Montez Benjamin seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order dismissing as untimely her 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Benjamin has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

The parties consented to the exercise of the district court's jurisdiction by a magistrate judge, as permitted by 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(2006).

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Benjamin v. Johnson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 18, 2011
411 F. App'x 630 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Benjamin v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:Gina Montez BENJAMIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Director…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 18, 2011

Citations

411 F. App'x 630 (4th Cir. 2011)