Benjamin v. Haws

Full title: DERRICK BENJAMIN, Plaintiff, v. F.B. HAWS, Warden, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jun 12, 2011

CV 09-2046-VBF (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 12, 2011)

Opinion

DERRICK BENJAMIN, Plaintiff, v. F.B. HAWS, Warden, et al., Defendants. No. CV 09-2046-VBF (DTB) United States District Court, C.D. California. June 12, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all the records and files herein, and the Superseding Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Objections to the Superseding Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. Having made a de novo determination of those portions of the Superseding Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made, the Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing this action without prejudice.