From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benjamin R. Matthews & Assoc. v. Fitzgerald ( In re Prophet)

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District
Aug 24, 2023
No. 14-23-00588-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 24, 2023)

Opinion

14-23-00588-CR

08-24-2023

IN RE THORNTON RAY PROPHET, Relator


Do Not Publish - Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b).

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 176th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 262195

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

On August 16, 2023, relator Thornton Ray Prophet filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator seeks to compel the Harris County District Clerk to assign his habeas corpus for an out-of-time appeal to the appropriate court of appeals for consideration.

On June 2, 2023, this Court sent the following letter to the Harris County District Clerk:

On June 2, 2023, Thornton Prophet mistakenly filed the attached documents with the Fourteenth Court of Appeals. In accordance with Tex.R.App.P. 25, the documents affixed with this Court's file stamped date of receipt, is being forwarded to your office for assignment. Tex. Gov't Code Ann. section 22.202(h).
The document affixed to this Court's letter to the District Clerk was titled "post-conviction for a writ of habeas corpus under article 11.07, for an out-of-time appeal."

This Court's mandamus jurisdiction is governed by the Government Code. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221. A court of appeals may issue writs of mandamus against (1) a judge of a district, statutory county, statutory probate county, or county court in the court of appeals district; (2) a judge of a district court who is acting as a magistrate at a court of inquiry under Chapter 52 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in the court of appeals district; or (3) an associate judge of a district or county court appointed by a judge under Chapter 201 of the Family Code in the court of appeals district for the judge who appointed the associate judge. Id. § 22.221(b). The courts of appeals also may issue all writs necessary to enforce the court of appeals' jurisdiction. Id. § 22.221(a).

We have no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk unless necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See In re Bogus, No. 14-20-00728-CR, 2020 WL 6494973, at *1 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] Nov. 5, 2020) (orig. proceeding). Relator has not shown that the issuance of a writ against the district clerk is necessary to enforce this Court's jurisdiction.

The courts of appeal have no original habeas-corpus jurisdiction in criminal matters. In re Ayers, 515 S.W.3d 356, 356-57 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2016, orig. proceeding) (citing Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221(d)). Original jurisdiction to grant a writ of habeas corpus in a criminal case is vested in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the district courts, the county courts, or a judge in those courts. Id. (citing Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art 11.05).

For these reasons, we dismiss relator's petition for writ of mandamus for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Benjamin R. Matthews & Assoc. v. Fitzgerald ( In re Prophet)

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District
Aug 24, 2023
No. 14-23-00588-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Benjamin R. Matthews & Assoc. v. Fitzgerald ( In re Prophet)

Case Details

Full title:IN RE THORNTON RAY PROPHET, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District

Date published: Aug 24, 2023

Citations

No. 14-23-00588-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 24, 2023)