From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benjamin Franklin B. I. Corp. v. Schmidt

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
May 16, 1933
132 Cal.App. 39 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)

Opinion

Docket No. 8881.

May 16, 1933.

PROCEEDING in Certiorari to review an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Ruben S. Schmidt, Judge. Dismissed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

F.E. Davis, Edw. V. Jones and Milton H. Silverberg for Petitioner.

Everett W. Mattoon, County Counsel, S.V.O. Prichard, Deputy County Counsel, and Frank L. Guerena for Respondents.


[1] The writ of review was improperly issued in this proceeding. After return made to the writ our attention is first called in the briefs to the fact that the petition for the writ was unverified. The writ of review can be issued only upon a verified petition. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1069.)

[2] As we have so often said under similar circumstances, respondent judge is not a proper party to the proceeding.

The writ and the accompanying restraining order are set aside and the proceeding is dismissed.

Stephens, J., and Parker, J., pro tem., concurred.


Summaries of

Benjamin Franklin B. I. Corp. v. Schmidt

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
May 16, 1933
132 Cal.App. 39 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)
Case details for

Benjamin Franklin B. I. Corp. v. Schmidt

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BOND INDEMNITY CORPORATION (a Corporation), Petitioner…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two

Date published: May 16, 1933

Citations

132 Cal.App. 39 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)
22 P.2d 26

Citing Cases

United Farm Workers of Am. v. Agric. Labor Rel. Bd.

( Jenssen v. R.K.O. Studios, Inc., supra, 20 Cal.App.2d at p. 707.) Benjamin Franklin B. I. Corp. v. Schmidt…

Neblett v. Superior Court

The rule is settled in California that a judge of the superior court whose order it is sought to review by a…