From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benitez v. Biltmore Systems, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 5, 1986
496 So. 2d 189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 86-1768.

October 7, 1986. Rehearing Denied November 5, 1986.

On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to Circuit Court, Dade County, Appellate Division; Murray Goldman, Robert P. Kaye, and Richard Y. Feder, Judges.

Martin E. Levine, Miami, for petitioner.

Miller Selig, P.A., Miami, and James C. Kelley, Coral Gables, for respondent.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT, and JORGENSON, JJ.


The respondent concedes that its argument made before the circuit court acting in its appellate capacity was never made in the county court, and, therefore, petitioner never had an opportunity to brief or explicate her position.

Based upon that concession, we vacate the order of the circuit court affirming the judgment of the county court and remand to the circuit court with directions to remand to the county court for further proceedings in light of section 627.736, Florida Statutes (1985).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Benitez v. Biltmore Systems, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 5, 1986
496 So. 2d 189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Benitez v. Biltmore Systems, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BLANCA BENITEZ, PETITIONER, v. BILTMORE SYSTEMS, INC., RESPONDENT

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 5, 1986

Citations

496 So. 2d 189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)