From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benitez-Moreno v. Fox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 30, 2016
Case No. CV 15-1288-SJO (GJS) (C.D. Cal. May. 30, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CV 15-1288-SJO (GJS)

05-30-2016

FERNANDO BENITEZ-MORENO, Petitioner v. JACK FOX, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all other documents filed in this action, Respondent's Motion To Dismiss Petition ("Motion to Dismiss"), Petitioner's Motion To Amend Previous 2241 Petition ("Motion to Amend"), and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"). The time for filing Objections to the Report has passed, and no Objections have been filed with the Court.

The Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Motion to Amend is granted to the extent that the Court has considered its substance and attachments; (2) the Motion to Dismiss is granted; (3) the Petition is dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; and (4) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. DATE: May 30, 2016.

/s/_________

S. JAMES OTERO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Benitez-Moreno v. Fox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 30, 2016
Case No. CV 15-1288-SJO (GJS) (C.D. Cal. May. 30, 2016)
Case details for

Benitez-Moreno v. Fox

Case Details

Full title:FERNANDO BENITEZ-MORENO, Petitioner v. JACK FOX, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 30, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 15-1288-SJO (GJS) (C.D. Cal. May. 30, 2016)