From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benion v. Nielsen

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Apr 15, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv785-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Apr. 15, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv785-MHT (WO)

04-15-2013

REGINALD A. BENION, Petitioner, v. ROBERT NIELSEN, et al., Respondents.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows:

(1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 37) is adopted.

(2) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.

Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Benion v. Nielsen

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Apr 15, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv785-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Apr. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Benion v. Nielsen

Case Details

Full title:REGINALD A. BENION, Petitioner, v. ROBERT NIELSEN, et al., Respondents.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 15, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv785-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Apr. 15, 2013)

Citing Cases

Flournoy v. McSwain-Holland

Morrissey does not require the two-hearing system that Petitioner describes. See Benion v. Nielsen,…