From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benford v. O Coffee

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 17, 2024
CV 24-00635 WDK-SK (C.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2024)

Opinion

CV 24-00635 WDK-SK

04-17-2024

Sam Benford v. O Coffee, et al.


Present: The Honorable WILLIAM D. KELLER, United States District Judge

CIVIL MINUTES -GENERAL

Proceedings: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

Plaintiff Sam Benford is ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

The below time period has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause, in writing, on or before MAY 1, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff s response. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

Plaintiff obtained entry of default as to Defendant O Coffee and Defendant Boris B. Levin, as Trustee of The Testamentary Trust in the Estate of Meyer D. Levin, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a), but Plaintiff has not sought default judgment, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(b). Plaintiff can satisfy this order by seeking default judgment or by notifying the Court that default judgment will not be sought, at which point the clerk will close this matter.

It is plaintiffs responsibility to respond promptly to all Orders and to prosecute the action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time to respond. If necessary, plaintiff must also pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon the default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by the Court. See Local Rule 8.3.

No oral argument on this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff is due. Plaintiff s counsel is ordered to serve this minute order on all defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Benford v. O Coffee

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 17, 2024
CV 24-00635 WDK-SK (C.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2024)
Case details for

Benford v. O Coffee

Case Details

Full title:Sam Benford v. O Coffee, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Apr 17, 2024

Citations

CV 24-00635 WDK-SK (C.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2024)