From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benford v. Avakian

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 11, 2024
2:24-cv-01906-AB-MARx (C.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-01906-AB-MARx

06-11-2024

Sam Benford v. Steve Avakian et al

Daniel Tamayo


Daniel Tamayo

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE ANDRE BIROTTE JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: [In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Linkv. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before June 28, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

[X] Defendants Steve Avakian and Stephan Investments, LLC did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Benford v. Avakian

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 11, 2024
2:24-cv-01906-AB-MARx (C.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2024)
Case details for

Benford v. Avakian

Case Details

Full title:Sam Benford v. Steve Avakian et al

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jun 11, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-01906-AB-MARx (C.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2024)