From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benfeld v. Galkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 27, 2007
38 A.D.3d 814 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2006-05331.

March 27, 2007.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of warranty, the third-party defendants, Rostislav Galkin and Dinara Galkina, appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (McMahon, J.), dated May 2, 2006, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint, with leave to renew after the completion of discovery.

Krol O'Connor, New York, N.Y. (Igor Krol of counsel), for third-party defendants-appellants and defendant Fleming Properties, LLC.

Robinson Brog Leinwald Greene Genovese Gluck, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Nicholas Caputo of counsel), for defendants third-party plaintiffs-respondents.

Before: Mastro, J.P., Florio, Carni and McCarthy, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the motion for summary judgment with leave to renew after the completion of discovery ( see CPLR 3211 [d]; 3212 [f]).


Summaries of

Benfeld v. Galkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 27, 2007
38 A.D.3d 814 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Benfeld v. Galkin

Case Details

Full title:IGOR BENFELD et al., Plaintiffs, v. FLEMING PROPERTIES, LLC, Defendant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 27, 2007

Citations

38 A.D.3d 814 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 2684
831 N.Y.S.2d 338

Citing Cases

Fin. Freedom Senior Funding Corp. v. Rose

However, the Supreme Court properly denied summary judgment to the plaintiff, although the motion should have…