From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benetic v. Bizoumis

Court of Appeals of California, Second Appellate District, Division Three.
Nov 13, 2003
B162203 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 13, 2003)

Opinion

B162203.

11-13-2003

NICHOLAS J. BENETIC, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DIMITRI BIZOUMIS, Defendant and Respondent.


ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on October 31, 2003, be modified as follows:

On page 8, line 15, the third paragraph beginning with the word "Finally," and ending with the word "accident" is modified to read as follows:

Finally, plaintiffs sons declaration does not indicate what alleged "lies" defendant told his counsel. On this record, the trial court correctly ruled that plaintiffs sons declaration was insufficient to raise a triable issue of material fact as to whether defendant acted in good faith and whether he disclosed the relevant facts to his attorney regarding plaintiffs conduct following the boating accident.

[There is no change in the judgment.]

Appellants petition for rehearing is denied.


Summaries of

Benetic v. Bizoumis

Court of Appeals of California, Second Appellate District, Division Three.
Nov 13, 2003
B162203 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 13, 2003)
Case details for

Benetic v. Bizoumis

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS J. BENETIC, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DIMITRI BIZOUMIS…

Court:Court of Appeals of California, Second Appellate District, Division Three.

Date published: Nov 13, 2003

Citations

B162203 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 13, 2003)