From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benefit Concepts v. Macera

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 6, 2005
Civil Action No. 04-183 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 6, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 04-183.

June 6, 2005


ORDER


AND NOW, this 6th day of June, 2005, upon consideration of plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (docket entry # 38), defendant's response thereto, defendant's motion for summary judgment (docket entry # 39), plaintiff's response thereto, and the parties' epistolary responses to our Order of June 1, 2005, and in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART;

2. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is DENIED; and

3. By June 9, 2005, the parties each shall REPORT BY FAX (215-580-2156) whether they would prefer: (i) a non-jury trial as to the dollar amount of what plaintiff owes defendant; or (ii) arbitration of that narrow issue pursuant to Loc. R. Civ. P. 53.2.


Summaries of

Benefit Concepts v. Macera

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 6, 2005
Civil Action No. 04-183 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 6, 2005)
Case details for

Benefit Concepts v. Macera

Case Details

Full title:BENEFIT CONCEPTS, as Plan Administrator for Don Rosen Cadillac Employee…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 6, 2005

Citations

Civil Action No. 04-183 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 6, 2005)