From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benedict v. Hewlett-Packard Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
May 14, 2013
Case No.: 13-CV-0119-LHK (N.D. Cal. May. 14, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 13-CV-0119-LHK

05-14-2013

ERIC BENEDICT, on behalf of himself and classes of those similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Defendant.


ORDER RE: PROTECTIVE ORDER

On May 8, 2013, pursuant to this Court's Order, the parties submitted a Joint Letter Brief addressing whether Opt-In Plaintiffs in the instant case should be given access to Defendant's discovery designated "CONFIDENTIAL." ECF No. 39.

The extent to which FLSA opt-in plaintiffs are subject to individualized discovery remains unsettled. See Hoffman v. Constr. Protective Servs., Inc., 541 F.3d 1175, 1179 (9th Cir. 2008) (noting that the district court in that action had recognized this area of the law as unsettled); Coldiron v. Pizza Hut, Inc., CV03-05865TJHMCX, 2004 WL 2601180 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2004) (recognizing two lines of cases regarding individualized discovery in opt-in class actions). In the parties' Joint Letter Brief, neither party cites to precedent governing opt-in plaintiffs' access to materials designated as confidential, or the implications of such access for individualized discovery. Furthermore, each of the cases Defendant cites as authority for opt-in discovery refers to discovery following conditional certification of an opt-in class. See Hill v. R&L Carriers Shared Services, LLC, CV 09-1907 CW MEJ, 2010 WL 3769247, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 22, 2010); Coldiron, 2004 WL 2601180, at *2; Abubakar v. City of Solano, CIVS-06-2268LKKEFB, 2008 WL 508911, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2008). In the instant case, Plaintiff's Motion for Conditional FLSA Certification will be heard on September 19, 2013.

The Court finds that at this stage of the litigation, prior to conditional certification, Opt-In Plaintiffs may access Defendant's discovery designated "CONFIDENTIAL," under the conditions Plaintiff proposes in the Joint Letter Brief. However, any Opt-In Plaintiff who chooses to access such material shall also be subject to reciprocal, reasonable, and appropriate discovery.

IT IS SO ORDERD.

______________________

LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Benedict v. Hewlett-Packard Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
May 14, 2013
Case No.: 13-CV-0119-LHK (N.D. Cal. May. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Benedict v. Hewlett-Packard Co.

Case Details

Full title:ERIC BENEDICT, on behalf of himself and classes of those similarly…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: May 14, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 13-CV-0119-LHK (N.D. Cal. May. 14, 2013)