From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benedict v. Estate of Noumair

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 11, 2001
289 A.D.2d 71 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

5576

December 11, 2001.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered on or about April 5, 2000, which granted defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint as time-barred, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Stuart E. Abrams, for plaintiffs-appellants.

James S. Morris, for defendants-respondents.

Before: Rosenberger, J.P., Williams, Tom, Mazzarelli, Ellerin, JJ.


Inasmuch as the claims for legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty comprising plaintiffs' complaint accrued in 1991, when the alleged malpractice and breach, i.e., the failure to record a mortgage after a closing, occurred (see, Shumsky v. Eisenstein, 96 N.Y.2d 164, 166; Glamm v. Allen, 57 N.Y.2d 87, 95), the complaint, filed in 1999, is time-barred (see, CPLR 214(6); see also, Kahn v. Hart, 270 A.D.2d 231).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Benedict v. Estate of Noumair

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 11, 2001
289 A.D.2d 71 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Benedict v. Estate of Noumair

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA E. BENEDICT, ETC., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. ESTATE OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 11, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 71 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
733 N.Y.S.2d 867

Citing Cases

Yarbro v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Plaintiffs' attempt to extend the statute of limitations by equitable tolling is unsupported by any…