From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benedick v. SSM Cardiovascular

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Oct 2, 2012
380 S.W.3d 652 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 98081.

2012-10-2

Katie BENEDICK, Appellant, v. SSM CARDIOVASCULAR, et al., Respondents.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Charles County, Nancy L. Schneider, Judge. Todd N. Hendrickson, Clayton, MO, for Appellant. James P. Reinert, William J. Magrath, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Charles County, Nancy L. Schneider, Judge.


Todd N. Hendrickson, Clayton, MO, for Appellant. James P. Reinert, William J. Magrath, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

Katie Benedick appeals the judgment of the trial court dismissing her causes of action for negligent misrepresentation, intentional misrepresentation, and violation of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act against SSM Cardiovascular & Thoracic Services, Inc. and Stephen D'Orazio, M.D. for failure to file an affidavit pursuant to Section 538.225 RSMo (Cum.Supp.2005). We find that the trial court did not err in dismissing Benedick's claims of negligent misrepresentation, intentional misrepresentation, and violation of the MMPA for failure to file a health care affidavit. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Benedick v. SSM Cardiovascular

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Oct 2, 2012
380 S.W.3d 652 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Benedick v. SSM Cardiovascular

Case Details

Full title:Katie BENEDICK, Appellant, v. SSM CARDIOVASCULAR, et al., Respondents.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Date published: Oct 2, 2012

Citations

380 S.W.3d 652 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)