From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benedetto v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 16, 2007
957 So. 2d 109 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. 4D07-1020.

May 16, 2007.

Appeal from the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Ana I. Gardiner, J.

Anthony K. Benedetto, Lake City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


We affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion. Appellant's habitual violent felony offender (HVFO) sentence was not affected by the amendments of Chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, which were found unconstitutional in State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla. 1999). Although appellant committed his offense within the window period established by Thompson, the trial court could have imposed the HVFO sentence in this case under the prior version of the statute without the amendments. Johnson v. State, 763 So.2d 283 (Fla. 2000); Tiger v. State, 764 So.2d 824 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

POLEN, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Benedetto v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 16, 2007
957 So. 2d 109 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Benedetto v. State

Case Details

Full title:Anthony K. BENEDETTO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 16, 2007

Citations

957 So. 2d 109 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. State

AFFIRMED. See State v. Matthews, 891 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 2004); Hall v. State, 821 So. 2d 1154 (Fla. 2d DCA…

Nelms v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr.

The HVFO sentencing category was neither created nor affected by chapter 95-182 and therefore, Petitioner has…