From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benecke-Kaliko AG v. Haartz Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jun 15, 2015
607 F. App'x 997 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Opinion

2015-1110

06-15-2015

BENECKE-KALIKO AG, Appellant v. THE HAARTZ CORPORATION, Appellee

MARK D. KLINKO, Fay Sharpe, LLP, Cleveland, OH, argued for appellant. Also represented by JUDE A. FRY. STEVEN JAY GROSSMAN, Grossman Tucker Perreault & Pfleger, PLLC, Manchester, NH, argued for appellee. Also represented by BETH A. FILIP.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/000,611.

JUDGMENT

MARK D. KLINKO, Fay Sharpe, LLP, Cleveland, OH, argued for appellant. Also represented by JUDE A. FRY. STEVEN JAY GROSSMAN, Grossman Tucker Perreault & Pfleger, PLLC, Manchester, NH, argued for appellee. Also represented by BETH A. FILIP. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 15, 2015

Date

/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Benecke-Kaliko AG v. Haartz Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jun 15, 2015
607 F. App'x 997 (Fed. Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Benecke-Kaliko AG v. Haartz Corp.

Case Details

Full title:BENECKE-KALIKO AG, Appellant v. THE HAARTZ CORPORATION, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jun 15, 2015

Citations

607 F. App'x 997 (Fed. Cir. 2015)