From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bender v. Sullivan

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 26, 2009
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00575 DLB PC, (Docs. 6 and 7) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 26, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00575 DLB PC, (Docs. 6 and 7).

June 26, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff Floyd Eugene Bender ("plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 23, 2009, Plaintiff filed a request for the Court to screen his complaint and to order service of process. (Doc. 6.) Plaintiff also filed a motion to withdraw his consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (Doc. 7.) Defendants have not yet appeared in this action.

Once a civil case is referred to a Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the reference can be withdrawn only "for good cause shown on its own motion, or under extraordinary circumstances shown by any party." Dixon v. Ylst, 990 F.2d 478, 480 (9th Cir. 1993). Plaintiff has not provided any basis for his motion and therefore has not demonstrated extraordinary circumstances warranting a withdrawal of the reference of this action to a Magistrate Judge. The motion is therefore denied.

With respect to Plaintiff's request that his complaint be screened and service of process ordered, Plaintiff is advised that this court is overburdened with cases, all of which are of equal importance, and almost half of the which are inmate civil rights suits. Although the Court recognizes that the instant action is of the utmost importance to Plaintiff, it is but one of many hundreds filed with this court and is no more extraordinary or exceptional than any of the others. When a prisoner civil rights complaint is filed with this Court, the Court will screen the complaint in due course. Until the court has done so and has found that Plaintiff states cognizable claims against the defendant(s), a request for service of process by the United States Marshal is premature. Plaintiff's request that the Court screen his complaint and order service of process is therefore disregarded.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bender v. Sullivan

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 26, 2009
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00575 DLB PC, (Docs. 6 and 7) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 26, 2009)
Case details for

Bender v. Sullivan

Case Details

Full title:FLOYD EUGENE BENDER, Plaintiff, v. W.J. SULLIVAN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 26, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00575 DLB PC, (Docs. 6 and 7) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 26, 2009)