Summary
finding that defendant's "confiscation" of plaintiff's work-issued laptop when she was on FMLA leave didn't "materially affect[] her position"
Summary of this case from Parker v. StateOpinion
Case No: 8:04-cv-1929-T-23EAJ.
April 19, 2006
ORDER
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Rule 6.01(b), a December 13, 2005, order (Doc. 34) referred the defendant's motion (Docs. 21) for summary judgment to the United States Magistrate Judge for a report and recommendation. Following the Magistrate Judge's April 4, 2006, report and recommendation (Doc. 37), no party objects to the report and the time for filing objections has expired.
Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation (Doc. 37) is ADOPTED. The defendant's motion (Doc. 21) for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to (1) enter judgment in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff, (2) terminate any pending motion, and (3) close the case.
ORDERED.