Bender v. Allstate Indem. Co.

Full title: MARK BENDER Plaintiff, v. ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, District of New Mexico

Date published: Dec 13, 2022

1:22-cv-00646-KWR-GBW (D.N.M. Dec. 13, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-cv-00646-KWR-GBW

12-13-2022

MARK BENDER Plaintiff, v. ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant.

GUBERNICK LAW, P.L.L.C. Benjamin Gubernick And Todd J. Bullion, LAW OFFICE OF TODD J. BULLION Attorneys for Plaintiff MODRALL, SPERLING, ROEHL, HARRIS & SISK, P.A., Jennifer A. Noya Attorneys for Defendant Allstate

KEA W. RIGGS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

GUBERNICK LAW, P.L.L.C.

Benjamin Gubernick

And Todd J. Bullion, LAW OFFICE OF TODD J. BULLION

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MODRALL, SPERLING, ROEHL, HARRIS & SISK, P.A., Jennifer A. Noya

Attorneys for Defendant Allstate

STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

KEA W. RIGGS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice (Doc. 14) and the Court having been fully informed in the premises, HEREBY FINDS that the Motion is WELL TAKEN and should be GRANTED.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Plaintiff Mark Bender's Complaint and all claims made or which could have been made against Defendant Allstate Indemnity Company are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party SHALL BEAR their own costs and attorneys' fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 1