From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bendelladj v. Dulgov

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Aug 27, 2024
CV 23-00255-TUC-CKJ (LCK) (D. Ariz. Aug. 27, 2024)

Opinion

CV 23-00255-TUC-CKJ (LCK)

08-27-2024

Hamza Bendelladj, Petitioner, v. A. Dulgov, Warden, Respondent.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Honorable Lynnette C. Kimmins, United States Magistrate Judge.

Petitioner Hamza Bendelladj filed a Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Docs. 1, 2.) Pursuant to the Rules of Practice of this Court, this matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Kimmins for Report and Recommendation. The Magistrate Judge recommends the District Court, after its independent review of the record, dismiss the case because Petitioner's location is unknown and he failed to comply with Court rules and a Court order.

On August 7, 2023, the Court entered an order directing the Clerk of the Court to serve Respondent with a copy of the Petition. (Doc. 5.) The Court's Order also informed Petitioner of his responsibility to notify the Court, pursuant to Rule 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure, of any change of address. (Id. at 1-2.) Petitioner was notified that failure to comply with this requirement could result in dismissal of his case. (Id.)

At the time Petitioner initiated this case and filed his Reply, he was housed at FCI Safford in Arizona. (Docs. 1, 10.) However, in the summer of 2024, the Bureau of Prisons' inmate locator showed Petitioner as housed at Terminal Island FCI. https://www.bop.gov/inmateloc/. Because Petitioner was in violation of the requirement that he notify the Court of any change of address, the Court issued an order to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for that violation. (Doc. 11.) That order informed Petitioner that if he did not respond, “this case will be dismissed.” (Id. at 2.) A response to the order was due on June 27, 2024. (Id.) The Court had the order to show cause sent to Petitioner's address on file as well as the location identified on the BOP website, but Petitioner did not respond. The BOP's website now indicates that Petitioner was released from BOP custody on August 16, 2024.

Because Petitioner failed to file a change of address, did not respond to the order to show cause, and the Court has no way to reach him, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the District Court enter an order DISMISSING the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), any party may serve and file written objections within fourteen days of being served with a copy of the Report and Recommendation. A party may respond to the other party's objections within fourteen days. No reply brief shall be filed on objections unless leave is granted by the District Court. If objections are not timely filed, they may be deemed waived. If objections are filed, the parties should use the following case number: CV-23-00255-CKJ.

In the event Petitioner has a forwarding address with BOP, the Court will direct the Clerk of Court to send this Report and Recommendation to Petitioner's address of record as well as the address of Terminal Island FCI.


Summaries of

Bendelladj v. Dulgov

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Aug 27, 2024
CV 23-00255-TUC-CKJ (LCK) (D. Ariz. Aug. 27, 2024)
Case details for

Bendelladj v. Dulgov

Case Details

Full title:Hamza Bendelladj, Petitioner, v. A. Dulgov, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Aug 27, 2024

Citations

CV 23-00255-TUC-CKJ (LCK) (D. Ariz. Aug. 27, 2024)