From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bendan Holding Corporation v. Rodner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1935
245 App. Div. 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

June, 1935.


Order denying defendant's motion to serve an amended answer reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, upon condition that the date of issue remain the same; the proposed amended answer to be served within five days from the entry of the order herein. Whether or not the proposed defense is meritorious must be decided at the trial. It cannot be determined on affidavits. The courts have adopted a liberal policy in permitting amendments to enable parties to litigate all questions affecting their rights. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bendan Holding Corporation v. Rodner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1935
245 App. Div. 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Bendan Holding Corporation v. Rodner

Case Details

Full title:BENDAN HOLDING CORPORATION, Respondent, v. HAROLD RODNER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1935

Citations

245 App. Div. 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Citing Cases

Whitestone Realty Corp. v. Malba Properties

In our opinion, appellant's attempt at amendment, designed merely to change the alleged valuations of the…

Station Assoc. v. Long Island R.R. Co.

Having failed to do so, it was necessary that the instant application be made and it was made on January 29,…