rejecting the notion that SSR 96-8p requires an ALJ to "make specific, written findings on dozens of individual work function categories" and opining that while a written function-by-function analysis at step four is desirable, it is not required
Summary of this case from Tenorio v. BerryhillNo. 00-1995.
December 19, 2000.
Appeal from E.D.Pa.
Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
rejecting the notion that SSR 96-8p requires an ALJ to "make specific, written findings on dozens of individual work function categories" and opining that while a written function-by-function analysis at step four is desirable, it is not required
Summary of this case from Tenorio v. BerryhillIn Bencivengo v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 251 F.3d 153 (table), No. 00-1995 (3d Cir. Dec. 19, 2000), the Third Circuit stated, "Although a function-by-function analysis is desirable, SSR 96-8p does not require ALJs to produce such a detailed statement in writing."
Summary of this case from Weisbrot v. Soc. Sec. Admin.In Bencivengo [v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 251 F.3d 153 (table), No. 00-1995 (3d Cir. Dec. 19, 2000)], the Third Circuit stated, "Although a function-by-function analysis is desirable, SSR 96-8p does not require ALJs to produce such a detailed statement in writing."
Summary of this case from Anderson v. Soc. Sec. Admin.noting the difference "between what an ALJ must consider and what an ALJ must discuss in a written opinion"
Summary of this case from Elder v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.In Bencivengo [v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 251 F.3d 153 (table), No. 00-1995 (3d Cir. Dec. 19, 2000)], the Third Circuit stated, "Although a function-by-function analysis is desirable, SSR 96-8p does not require ALJs to produce such a detailed statement in writing."
Summary of this case from Norris v. Soc. Sec. Admin.In Bencivengo [v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 251 F.3d 153 (table), No. 00-1995 (3d Cir. Dec. 19, 2000)],the Third Circuit stated, "Although a function-by-function analysis is desirable, SSR 96-8p does not require ALJs to produce such a detailed statement in writing."
Summary of this case from Green v. Soc. Sec. Admin.In Bencivengo [v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 251 F.3d 153 (table), No. 00-1995 (3d Cir. Dec. 19, 2000)], the Third Circuit stated, "Although a function-by-function analysis is desirable, SSR 96-8p does not require ALJs to produce such a detailed statement in writing."
Summary of this case from Ramsey v. Soc. Sec. Admin.In Bencivengo [v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 251 F.3d 153 (table), No. 00-1995 (3d Cir. Dec. 19, 2000)], the Third Circuit stated, "Although a function-by-function analysis is desirable, SSR 96-8p does not require ALJs to produce such a detailed statement in writing."
Summary of this case from Maye v. Soc. Sec. Admin.In Bencivengo [v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 251 F.3d 153 (table), No. 00-1995 (3d Cir. Dec. 19, 2000)], the Third Circuit stated, "Although a function-by-function analysis is desirable, SSR 96-8p does not require ALJs to produce such a detailed statement in writing."
Summary of this case from Keel v. Soc. Sec. Admin.In Bencivengo [v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 251 F.3d 153 (table), No. 00-1995 (3d Cir. Dec. 19, 2000)], the Third Circuit stated, "Although a function-by-function analysis is desirable, SSR 96-8p does not require ALJs to produce such a detailed statement in writing."
Summary of this case from Brown v. Soc. Sec. Admin.In Bencivengo [v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 251 F.3d 153 (table), No. 00-1995 (3d Cir. Dec. 19, 2000)], the Third Circuit stated, "Although a function-by-function analysis is desirable, SSR 96-8p does not require ALJs to produce such a detailed statement in writing."
Summary of this case from Nash v. Soc. Sec. Admin.In Bencivengo, the Third Circuit noted that there is no requirement under SSR 96-8p "to make specific, written findings on dozens of individual work function categories" and that instead it is only necessary to "articulate how the evidence in the record supports the RFC determination, discuss the claimant's ability to perform sustained work-related activities, and explain the resolution of any inconsistencies in the record."
Summary of this case from Hernandez-Flores v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.In Bencivengo,the Third Circuit stated, "Although a function-by-function analysis is desirable, SSR 96-8p does not require ALJs to produce such a detailed statement in writing."
Summary of this case from Miller v. Soc. Sec. Admin.Full title:BENCIVENGO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SEC
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Date published: Dec 19, 2000
Instead, the ALJ '"need only articulate how the evidence in the record supports the RFC determination,…
Zuber v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.In formulating the RFC, "'the ALJ need only articulate how the evidence in the record supports the RFC…