From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benchmark Capital Holdings Co. v. Benchmark Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 29, 2011
CASE NO. 3:11-cv-04883-RS (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:11-cv-04883-RS

11-29-2011

BENCHMARK CAPITAL HOLDINGS CO., LLC, Plaintiff, v. THE BENCHMARK COMPANY, LLC Defendant.

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737) Diane Doolittle (Bar No. 142046) Attorneys for Plaintiff Benchmark Capital Holdings Co., LLC GORDON I. ENDOW (SBN 99638) HEIDI J. KIM (SBN 247699) GORDON & REES LLP ANTHONY PADUANO (Pro Hac Vice) KATHERINE B. HARRISON (Pro Hac Vice) PADUANO & WEINTRAUB LLP Attorneys for Defendant The Benchmark Company, LLC


QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP

Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737)

Diane Doolittle (Bar No. 142046)

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Benchmark Capital Holdings Co., LLC

GORDON I. ENDOW (SBN 99638)

HEIDI J. KIM (SBN 247699)

GORDON & REES LLP

ANTHONY PADUANO

(Pro Hac Vice)

KATHERINE B. HARRISON

(Pro Hac Vice)

PADUANO & WEINTRAUB LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

The Benchmark Company, LLC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENDING MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Plaintiff Benchmark Capital Holdings Co., LLC, and Defendant The Benchmark Company, LLC jointly stipulate, through their counsel of record and subject to court approval, as follows:

WHEREAS,

1. Defendant on November 17, 2011, filed a Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint, with the hearing on that motion scheduled for January 5, 2012;
2. Along with the Motion to Dismiss, Defendant also filed an accompanying Request for Judicial Notice and Declaration of Jillian A. Lazar (Lazar Declaration) on November 17, 2011;
3. Plaintiff's opposition to the Motion to Dismiss, and any objections or other responses to the Request for Judicial Notice and the Lazar Declaration, are due on December 1, 2011;
4. Defendant's reply to Plaintiff's opposition to the Motion to Dismiss is due on December 8, 2011;
5. Defendant agrees to extend the time for Plaintiff to respond to the Motion to Dismiss, the Request for Judicial Notice and the Lazar Declaration until December 5, 2011;
6. Plaintiff accordingly agrees to extend the time for Defendant to reply to Plaintiff's opposition until December 12, 2011;

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties stipulate, through their undersigned counsel, that:

1. The deadline for Plaintiff to respond to the Motion to Dismiss, the Request for Judicial Notice and the Lazar Declaration is December 5, 2011.

2. The deadline for Defendant to file its reply papers to Plaintiff's responsive papers is December 12, 2011.

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP

Diane Doolittle

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Benchmark Capital Holdings Co., LLC

GORDON & REES LLP

Gordon I. Endow

Attorneys for Defendant

The Benchmark Company, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BENCHMARK CAPITAL HOLDINGS CO., LLC, Plaintiff,

vs.

THE BENCHMARK COMPANY, LLC Defendant.

CASE NO. 3:11-cv-04883-RS

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR EXTENDING MOTION TO


DISMISS BRIEFING SCHEDULE

CAME FOR CONSIDERATION the Joint Stipulation For Extending Motion to Dismiss Briefing Schedule. After consideration, the Court orders the Stipulation to be GRANTED.

1. The deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, Request for Judicial Notice and Declaration of Jillian A. Lazar is December 5, 2011.

2. The deadline for Defendant to file its reply papers to Plaintiff's responsive papers is December 12, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Hon. Richard Seeborg

United State District Judge


Summaries of

Benchmark Capital Holdings Co. v. Benchmark Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 29, 2011
CASE NO. 3:11-cv-04883-RS (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2011)
Case details for

Benchmark Capital Holdings Co. v. Benchmark Co.

Case Details

Full title:BENCHMARK CAPITAL HOLDINGS CO., LLC, Plaintiff, v. THE BENCHMARK COMPANY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 29, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 3:11-cv-04883-RS (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2011)