Opinion
December 28, 2000.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered July 20, 1999, dismissing the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Roz Ben-Zvi, Pro Se
William J. Schwartz, for defendants-respondents.
Before: Rosenberger, J.P., Nardelli, Williams, Mazzarelli, Friedman, JJ.
Plaintiff's cause of action for legal malpractice based on defendants' representation of him in a Federal criminal proceeding is precluded by plaintiff's undisturbed conviction on some of the charges in that proceeding, an obstacle that plaintiff cannot avoid by pleading a purported cause of action for breach of contract alleging that defendants failed to perform their contract to represent him with due care (see,Kaplan v. Sachs, 224 A.D.2d 666, lv dismissed and denied 88 N.Y.2d 952). Plaintiff's cause of action for fraud, based on allegations that defendants billed him for services that either were not performed or were overstated, was properly dismissed for failure to satisfy the specificity requirement of CPLR 3016(b) (see, Callas v. Eisenberg, 192 A.D.2d 349). Plaintiff's cause of action for negligent infliction of emotional distress was properly dismissed for lack of an allegation that defendants' conduct unreasonably and directly endangered his physical safety (see, Wolkstein v. Morgenstern, 275 A.D.2d 635, 637 713 N.Y.S.2d 171, 172).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.