From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beltran v. Runnels

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division
May 4, 2009
CV 06-367-VBF (PLA) (C.D. Cal. May. 4, 2009)

Opinion


FRANCISCO BELTRAN, Petitioner, v. DAVID L. RUNNELS, Warden, et al., Respondents. No. CV 06-367-VBF (PLA) United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. May 4, 2009

          ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

          VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. The Court agrees with the recommendations of the magistrate judge.

         ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED:

         1. The report and recommendation is adopted.

         2. Judgment shall be entered consistent with this order.

         3. The clerk shall serve this order and the judgment on all counsel or parties of record.


Summaries of

Beltran v. Runnels

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division
May 4, 2009
CV 06-367-VBF (PLA) (C.D. Cal. May. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Beltran v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:FRANCISCO BELTRAN, Petitioner, v. DAVID L. RUNNELS, Warden, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: May 4, 2009

Citations

CV 06-367-VBF (PLA) (C.D. Cal. May. 4, 2009)