From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beltran v. Commercial Bldg. Maint. Corp.

Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 28, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 4115 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

Index No. 654275/19 No. 16200 Case No. 2021-03409

06-28-2022

Joel Beltran et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Commercial Building Maintenance Corp., Defendant, Carlton Campbell, Defendant-Respondent.

The Law Office of Justin A. Zeller, P.C., New York (John M. Gurrieri of counsel), for appellants.


The Law Office of Justin A. Zeller, P.C., New York (John M. Gurrieri of counsel), for appellants.

Before: Gische, J.P., Kern, Mazzarelli, Singh, Rodriguez, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Nancy M. Bannon, J.), entered on or about August 10, 2021, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiffs' motion for a default judgment against defendant Carlton Campbell and, on the court's own motion, dismissed the complaint as against him, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court correctly denied plaintiffs' renewed motion for a default judgment against defendant Carlton Campbell, as plaintiffs failed, as they had failed on the prior motion, to submit a verified complaint or an affidavit by a person with knowledge of the facts constituting the claim (see Beltre v Babu, 32 A.D.3d 722 [1st Dept 2006]; Utak v Commerce Bank Inc., 88 A.D.3d 522, 523 [1st Dept 2011]). Since plaintiffs' counsel's firm was also a party to this action, the submission of an affirmation, instead of an affidavit, by counsel was improper (LaRusso v Katz, 30 A.D.3d 240, 243 [1st Dept 2006]; John Harris P.C. v Krauss, 87 A.D.3d 469 [1st Dept 2011]).

To the extent plaintiffs object to the motion court's sua sponte dismissal of the action, their proper course was to move that court to vacate the order or to seek leave to appeal from this Court, since there is no appeal as of right from a sua sponte order (Meng v Allen, 117 A.D.3d 621 [1st Dept 2014]). In light of counsel's repeated failure to properly prosecute this action, which would largely benefit his law firm, this Court will not deem the notice of appeal a motion for leave to appeal in the interest of justice (see New Globaltex Co., Ltd. v Zhe Lin, 173 A.D.3d 434 [1st Dept 2019]).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Beltran v. Commercial Bldg. Maint. Corp.

Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 28, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 4115 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

Beltran v. Commercial Bldg. Maint. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Joel Beltran et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Commercial Building…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 28, 2022

Citations

2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 4115 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Citing Cases

Billig v. Schwartz

Initially, we note that the affirmation proffered by defendant Yisroel Schwartz in opposition to the motion…