From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beltran v. Aitken

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 28, 2011
No. 2: 11-cv-1857 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2: 11-cv-1857 KJN P

09-28-2011

GIRLIE BELTRAN, Petitioner, v. TIM AITKEN, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

Petitioner is proceeding through counsel, with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On August 11, 2011, respondents filed a motion to dismiss. Petitioner has not opposed the motion. However, respondent did not notice the motion for hearing as required by Local Rule 230(b).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent's motion to dismiss filed August 19, 2011 (Dkt. No. 11) is vacated without prejudice; within twenty days of the date of this order, respondent shall re-file the motion to dismiss and notice it for hearing before the undersigned.

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Beltran v. Aitken

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 28, 2011
No. 2: 11-cv-1857 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Beltran v. Aitken

Case Details

Full title:GIRLIE BELTRAN, Petitioner, v. TIM AITKEN, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 28, 2011

Citations

No. 2: 11-cv-1857 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)