From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Belton v. McDonald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 24, 2012
No. CIV-S-11-3365 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV-S-11-3365 CKD P

01-24-2012

VERNON LEE BELTON, JR., Petitioner, v. MICHAEL MCDONALD, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). Title 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's request for appointment of counsel (Docket No. 8) is denied without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at a later stage of the proceedings.

_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
/kly/belt3365.110


Summaries of

Belton v. McDonald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 24, 2012
No. CIV-S-11-3365 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Belton v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:VERNON LEE BELTON, JR., Petitioner, v. MICHAEL MCDONALD, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 24, 2012

Citations

No. CIV-S-11-3365 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2012)