From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Belssner v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 16, 2020
Case No. 2:17-CV-2016 JCM (EJY) (D. Nev. Mar. 16, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2:17-CV-2016 JCM (EJY)

03-16-2020

CHARLES N. BELSSNER, Plaintiff(s), v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant(s).


ORDER

Presently before the court is Magistrate Judge Foley's report and recommendation ("R&R"). (ECF No. 8). No objections have been filed and the time to do so has passed.

Judge Foley recommends dismissing pro se plaintiff Charles Belssner's complaint for failure to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 8). The court screened plaintiff's complaint, found that he failed to state a valid claim, and instructed plaintiff to file an amended complaint before August 2, 2018. (ECF No. 4). Plaintiff filed an amended complaint and the court found he once again failed to state a valid claim. (ECF No. 7). Plaintiff was warned that failure to file another amended complaint would result in a recommendation for dismissal and plaintiff has not filed anything further in the case.

This court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Where a party timely objects to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, then the court is required to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the [report and recommendation] to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Where a party fails to object, however, the court is not required to conduct "any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection." Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge's report and recommendation where no objections have been filed. See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114 (9th Cir. 2003) (disregarding the standard of review employed by the district court when reviewing a report and recommendation to which no objections were made).

Nevertheless, this court conducted a de novo review to determine whether to adopt the recommendation of the magistrate judge. Upon reviewing the recommendation and attendant circumstances, this court finds good cause appears to adopt the magistrate judge's findings in full.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Judge Foley's R&R (ECF No. 8) be, and the same hereby is, ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's complaint is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice.

The clerk is instructed to enter judgment and close the case accordingly.

DATED March 16, 2020.

/s/_________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Belssner v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 16, 2020
Case No. 2:17-CV-2016 JCM (EJY) (D. Nev. Mar. 16, 2020)
Case details for

Belssner v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES N. BELSSNER, Plaintiff(s), v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 16, 2020

Citations

Case No. 2:17-CV-2016 JCM (EJY) (D. Nev. Mar. 16, 2020)