From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Belmontes v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 6, 2011
Case No.: 1:10-cv-02378 JLT (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:10-cv-02378 JLT Doc. 13

09-06-2011

JOSE L. BELMONTES, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME

Parties have stipulated by counsel to extend the period of time for Defendant to a responsive brief. (Doc. 13). Here, Defendant's counsel seeks an extension of thirty days due to her obligations including a "heavy appellate workload" and "several unavoidable meetings." (Doc. 13 at 1-2). The Scheduling Order allows a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties. (Doc. 7-1 at 4). Accordingly, Defendant shall file a responsive brief on or before October 7, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Jennifer L. Thurston

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Belmontes v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 6, 2011
Case No.: 1:10-cv-02378 JLT (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2011)
Case details for

Belmontes v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JOSE L. BELMONTES, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 6, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 1:10-cv-02378 JLT (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2011)