From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Belmonte v. Smith

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 2, 2022
2:19-cv-0269 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2022)

Opinion

2:19-cv-0269 KJM AC P

11-02-2022

MIGUEL BELMONTE, Plaintiff, v. A. SMITH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On October 28, 2022, plaintiff and defendant M. Carter filed a joint motion to dismiss this case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) and Local Rule 160. ECF No. 41. The motion will be granted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The parties' joint motion to dismiss (ECF No. 41) is GRANTED;

2. This matter is DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) and Local Rule 160; and

3. This case is CLOSED.


Summaries of

Belmonte v. Smith

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 2, 2022
2:19-cv-0269 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Belmonte v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:MIGUEL BELMONTE, Plaintiff, v. A. SMITH, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 2, 2022

Citations

2:19-cv-0269 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2022)