Belmont v. State

1 Citing case

  1. Hammonds v. State

    206 So. 2d 924 (Ala. Crim. App. 1968)   Cited 5 times

    Finally, we must follow the Supreme Court of Alabama. Code 1940, T. 13, § 95. This reasoning requires that, to the extent of conflict with Warwick, supra, the following cases no longer are authority on this point: Belmont v. State, 16 Ala. App. 390, 78 So. 306; Washington v. State, 16 Ala. App. 580, 80 So. 154; Rodgers v. State, 17 Ala. App. 24, 81 So. 360; Angelo v. State, 21 Ala. App. 190, 106 So. 512; Lambert v. State, 21 Ala. App. 391, 108 So. 631; Catrett v. State, 26 Ala. App. 413, 161 So. 109; Brinkley v. State, 26 Ala. App. 546, 163 So. 467. We omit Lessley v. State, 18 Ala. App. 657, 94 So. 262, from this list because the escape came after decision.