From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bells v. Groves

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 9, 2021
5:19-cv-02421-DMG(SK) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2021)

Opinion

5:19-cv-02421-DMG(SK)

07-09-2021

Charlie B. Bells Jr. et al. v. Groves et al.


Present: The Honorable Steve Kim, United States Magistrate Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings:(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Plaintiffs opposition to Defendant's motion to dismiss or for summary judgment is past due. He is thus ordered to show cause by August 9, 2021, why his complaint should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); L.R. 41-1; see also L.R. 7-12 (failure to oppose a motion to dismiss "maybe deemed consent to the granting of the motion"). Plaintiff may discharge this order by filing his opposition no later than August 9, 2021. If Petitioner wishes to voluntarily dismiss his complaint instead, he may do so by filing the attached notice of voluntary dismissal. Failure to file a timely opposition to Defendant's motion to dismiss, a timely notice of voluntary dismissal, or other timely response to this order may serve as another basis to dismiss this action for lack of prosecution.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bells v. Groves

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 9, 2021
5:19-cv-02421-DMG(SK) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Bells v. Groves

Case Details

Full title:Charlie B. Bells Jr. et al. v. Groves et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 9, 2021

Citations

5:19-cv-02421-DMG(SK) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2021)