From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bello v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jun 3, 2016
No. 05-15-01170-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 3, 2016)

Opinion

No. 05-15-01170-CR

06-03-2016

OYESOLA O. BELLO, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F-0571298-M

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Myers, Stoddart, and Whitehill
Opinion by Justice Whitehill

Appellant Oyesola Bello was on probation for aggravated kidnapping when the State moved to adjudicate guilt. The allegations in the State's motion included aggravated robbery, possession of a firearm, and delinquency on fees and community service. The court found these allegations to be true and sentenced appellant to forty years imprisonment.

Bello requests that we correct two errors in the judgment—the trial counsel's name and a reference to the motion to adjudicate guilt. In a cross-point, the State also requests that we correct the judgment to reflect that Bello was convicted of aggravated kidnapping under penal code section 20.04.

An appellate court can modify incorrect judgments when the evidence necessary to correct a judgment appears in the record. Asberry v. State, 813 S.W.2d 526, 529 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1991, writ ref'd); TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2 (b).

The judgment states that Bello was convicted of aggravated kidnapping under penal code section 29.03. The correct penal code section, however, is 20.04. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 20.04.

The judgment also states that Bello's trial counsel was "Timothy Jenfield." The record, however, reflects that counsel's name was "Timothy Jeffrey."

Finally, the judgment states that Bello violated the terms of the original motion to adjudicate guilt. But the record reflects that the court found Bello guilty of violating the conditions of probation reflected in the State's amended motion to adjudicate guilt.

Therefore, we modify the judgment to reflect that (i) Timothy Jeffrey was Bello's trial counsel, (ii) Bello was convicted of aggravated kidnapping pursuant to TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 20.04, and (iii) the court found Bello guilty of violating the conditions of probation reflected in the State's amended motion to adjudicate guilt. As reformed, the trial court's judgment is affirmed.

/Bill Whitehill/

BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47
151170F.U05

JUDGMENT

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F-0571298-M.
Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill. Justices Myers and Stoddart participating.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is MODIFIED to reflect that: (i) the name of defense counsel is "Timothy Jeffrey,"(ii) Bello was convicted of aggravated kidnapping pursuant to TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 20.04, and (iii) the court found Bello guilty of violating the conditions of probation reflected in the State's amended motion to adjudicate guilt. As REFORMED, the judgment is AFFIRMED. Judgment entered June 3, 2016.


Summaries of

Bello v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jun 3, 2016
No. 05-15-01170-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 3, 2016)
Case details for

Bello v. State

Case Details

Full title:OYESOLA O. BELLO, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Jun 3, 2016

Citations

No. 05-15-01170-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 3, 2016)