From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bello v. Cablevision Systems Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 14, 1995
218 A.D.2d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

August 14, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the instant complaint because the plaintiffs failed to seek leave to replead at the time the defendant moved to dismiss the original complaint (see, CPLR 3211[e]; Licensing Dev. Group v. Freedman, 184 A.D.2d 682; Dunn v. Dunn, 162 A.D.2d 433; Fleet Factors v. Werblin, 138 A.D.2d 565, 567; Lotito v. Lund, 129 A.D.2d 776; Marcucilli v Alicon Corp., 48 A.D.2d 703). Rosenblatt, J.P., Altman, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bello v. Cablevision Systems Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 14, 1995
218 A.D.2d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Bello v. Cablevision Systems Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CARL BELLO et al., Appellants, v. CABLEVISION SYSTEMS CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 14, 1995

Citations

218 A.D.2d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
630 N.Y.S.2d 941

Citing Cases

Atkins Nutritionals, Inc. v. Ernst & Young LLP

The plaintiff failed to comply with CPLR 32 11(e) which requires a party who opposes a motion to dismiss for…

Atkins Nutritionals, Inc. v. Ernst Young LLP

The plaintiff failed to comply with CPLR 3211(e) which requires a party who opposes a motion to dismiss for…