From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bellinger v. Nadaine Are Better

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 9, 2021
2:21-cv-1525 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-1525 KJM CKD P

12-09-2021

BRIAN BELLINGER, Plaintiff, v. NADAINE ARE BETTER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On October 14, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 14, 2021 are adopted in full; and
2. This action is dismissed without prejudice.


Summaries of

Bellinger v. Nadaine Are Better

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 9, 2021
2:21-cv-1525 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Bellinger v. Nadaine Are Better

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN BELLINGER, Plaintiff, v. NADAINE ARE BETTER, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 9, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-1525 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2021)