holding that the fact that an employee spent 65 to 90 percent of his time on nonexempt tasks "is not a controlling factor under the regulations" for determining whether the employee was exempt from the FLSA's overtime provisions
Summary of this case from Guinup v. Petr-All Petroleum CorporationNo. 91-874.
January 27, 1992.
C.A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 938 F. 2d 1423.
holding that the fact that an employee spent 65 to 90 percent of his time on nonexempt tasks "is not a controlling factor under the regulations" for determining whether the employee was exempt from the FLSA's overtime provisions
Summary of this case from Guinup v. Petr-All Petroleum Corporationholding "sudden" unambiguous
Summary of this case from Providence Journal Co. v. Travelers Indemaffirming lower court's holding that individual who had signed a valid release could not opt-in to class of individuals who had not that release
Summary of this case from Watts v. Arnoldreversing trial court's judgment and dismissing based on lack of ripeness despite two city alderman stating "words to the effect that they wished to impede the development of the property by zoning the property" for more restrictive use (citing Mayhew, 774 S.W.2d 284 )
Summary of this case from City of Galveston v. Murphyenforcing release of ADEA claim in consideration of severance payment
Summary of this case from Joe v. First Bank Systemsetting forth the prima facie case for an interference claim
Summary of this case from Bublitz v. DuPont de Nemours and Companysetting forth the prima facie case for an interference claim
Summary of this case from Foster v. E.I. Dupont de Nemours and Co.reasoning that pollution prone industries cannot be treated exactly like "clean" industries
Summary of this case from Highlands Insurance Company v. Aerovox Incorporateddistinguishing between "sudden and accidental" releases and releases which result from ordinary business operations
Summary of this case from Nashua Corp. v. First State Insurance Co.discussing generally the concept of subject-matter jurisdiction
Summary of this case from West Texas Water Refiners, Inc. v. S & B Beverage Co.Full title:BELLEVILLE INDUSTRIES, INC. v. LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY CO
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jan 27, 1992
Because this case raises the issue of causation which was not raised as a basis for summary judgment in…
Employers Insurance of Wausau v. GeorgeThe judge reversed an earlier order entered by him on April 30, 1991, which had held that Aetna had a duty to…