From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Belle v. Concentrix Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 15, 2018
Case Number 18-11328 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 15, 2018)

Opinion

Case Number 18-11328

11-15-2018

LEE ANN BELLE, Plaintiff, v. CONCENTRIX CORPORATION, Defendant.



Magistrate Judge David R. Grand ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

Presently before the Court is the report issued on October 17, 2018 by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), recommending that the Court deny the defendant's motion to dismiss, after the magistrate judge separately granted the plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint. Although the report stated that the parties to this action could object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, no objections have been filed thus far. The parties' failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the report and recommendation (ECF No. 29) is ADOPTED, and the defendant's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 14) is DENIED.

s/David M. Lawson

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge Date: November 15, 2018

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on November 15, 2018.

s/Susan K. Pinkowski

SUSAN K. PINKOWSKI


Summaries of

Belle v. Concentrix Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 15, 2018
Case Number 18-11328 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 15, 2018)
Case details for

Belle v. Concentrix Corp.

Case Details

Full title:LEE ANN BELLE, Plaintiff, v. CONCENTRIX CORPORATION, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 15, 2018

Citations

Case Number 18-11328 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 15, 2018)