From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bellamy v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Jun 29, 2022
No. 1D21-3610 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jun. 29, 2022)

Opinion

1D21-3610

06-29-2022

Tomas Bellamy, Petitioner, v. State of Florida, Respondent.

Tomas Bellamy, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus-Original Jurisdiction.

Tomas Bellamy, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Because the trial court has ruled on the filing pending below, the Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Ward v. State, 770 So.2d 206, 207 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (denying a petition for writ of mandamus as moot where the trial court had ruled on the motion pending below).

ROBERTS, MAKAR, and JAY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bellamy v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Jun 29, 2022
No. 1D21-3610 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jun. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Bellamy v. State

Case Details

Full title:Tomas Bellamy, Petitioner, v. State of Florida, Respondent.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: Jun 29, 2022

Citations

No. 1D21-3610 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jun. 29, 2022)