From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bellamy v. Alden

Court of King's Bench Latch's Reports
Jan 1, 1793
1 N.C. 712 (N.C. 1793)

Opinion

(1793.)

An administrator accounted before the Ordinary, and a creditor took exception that he did not pay as much as he ought to; and a prohibition was prayed, because he proved it by his own testimony and he was excommunicated for default of proof.


CREW, C. J., and WHITLOCK, J., were absent.

And on another day, DODERIDGE, J., being absent, Ashley, Serj., prayed that prohibition might be stayed. Otherwise a legatee cannot have his remedy.


You have your remedy here.


It is proper for the Ordinary to examine the accounts.


There payment proved by one witness is not allowed.

And a prohibition was awarded because proof by one witness was disallowed.


The jurisdiction of the court is not taken away, but their proceedings stayed. 13 E., 3; F. Ex., 19; Bendl., 171; Noy, 178.


Summaries of

Bellamy v. Alden

Court of King's Bench Latch's Reports
Jan 1, 1793
1 N.C. 712 (N.C. 1793)
Case details for

Bellamy v. Alden

Case Details

Full title:BELLAMY v. ALDEN. — Pasch. 2 Car

Court:Court of King's Bench Latch's Reports

Date published: Jan 1, 1793

Citations

1 N.C. 712 (N.C. 1793)