From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Woodford

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 21, 2008
No. 2:07-cv-00113-JKS-DAD (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2008)

Opinion

No. 2:07-cv-00113-JKS-DAD.

February 21, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On June 26, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. No objections to the Findings and Recommendations have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this Court has reviewed the record on its face and finds no clear error.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed June 26, 2007, are adopted in full; 2. The Complaint is DISMISSED, without prejudice; and 3. The Clerk of the Court to enter final judgment accordingly.


Summaries of

Bell v. Woodford

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 21, 2008
No. 2:07-cv-00113-JKS-DAD (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2008)
Case details for

Bell v. Woodford

Case Details

Full title:GRANVIL K. BELL, III, Plaintiff, v. JEANNE WOODFORD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 21, 2008

Citations

No. 2:07-cv-00113-JKS-DAD (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2008)