From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Warden, FCI Tallahassee

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Jul 22, 2021
4:19cv442-WS/MAF (N.D. Fla. Jul. 22, 2021)

Opinion

4:19cv442-WS/MAF

07-22-2021

TONYA BELL, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, FCI TALLAHASSEE, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPT ING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

WILLIAM STAFFORD, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 65) docketed June 9, 2021. The magistrate judge recommends that (1) Petitioner's Rule 60 Motion be denied; (2) Respondent's motion to dismiss be denied; and (3) Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel be denied. No. objections to the report and recommendation have been filed.

The court has reviewed the record and-like the magistrate judge-finds that Petitioner has failed to establish that she is entitled to relief under Rule 60(b)(2).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 65) is ADOPTED and incorporated into this order by reference.

2. Petitioner's Rule 60 Motion (ECF No. 49) is DENIED.

3. Respondent's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 51) is DENIED as moot.

4. Petitioner's motion (ECF No. 64) for appointment of counsel is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bell v. Warden, FCI Tallahassee

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Jul 22, 2021
4:19cv442-WS/MAF (N.D. Fla. Jul. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Bell v. Warden, FCI Tallahassee

Case Details

Full title:TONYA BELL, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, FCI TALLAHASSEE, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Florida

Date published: Jul 22, 2021

Citations

4:19cv442-WS/MAF (N.D. Fla. Jul. 22, 2021)