From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Warden, Warren Correctional Institution

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Jun 21, 2011
Case No. 3:11-cv-135 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 21, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11-cv-135.

June 21, 2011


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #10), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). No notice of right to object was issued as Respondent has not yet been ordered to answer and the Report and Recommendations recommend granting the relief Petitioner requests.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Relief pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(a) is GRANTED, the judgment is reopened, and the Court will proceed with further analysis under Rule 4 of the Habeas Rules.


Summaries of

Bell v. Warden, Warren Correctional Institution

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Jun 21, 2011
Case No. 3:11-cv-135 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Bell v. Warden, Warren Correctional Institution

Case Details

Full title:DIAHNTAE BELL, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Warren Correctional Institution…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Jun 21, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:11-cv-135 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 21, 2011)

Citing Cases

Arnold v. Warden, Lebanon Corr. Inst.

See Nash v. Eberlin, 258 Fed.Appx. 761, 764–65 (6th Cir.2007). See also Bell v. Warden, Warren Corr. Inst.,…