From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Varga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Jul 1, 2019
Case No. 19-cv-00680-NJR (S.D. Ill. Jul. 1, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 19-cv-00680-NJR

07-01-2019

JESSIE BELL, #B81302, Petitioner, v. JOHN VARGA, WARDEN, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROSENSTENGEL, Chief Judge :

Petitioner Jessie Bell, an inmate of the Illinois Department of Corrections currently incarcerated at Dixon Correctional Center, brings this habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 to challenge his murder conviction in Union County, Illinois. See People v. Bell, Case No. 5-15-0382, 2018 WL 4622522 (5th Judicial Circuit). The case is now before the Court for a preliminary review of the Petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in United States District Courts. Rule 1(b) gives the Court the authority to apply the Rules to other habeas corpus proceedings, such as this action. Without commenting on the merits of Bell's claim, the Court concludes that the Petition survives preliminary review under Rule 4 and Rule 1(b), and a response shall be ordered. Given the limited record, it is not plainly apparent that Bell is not entitled to habeas relief.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Varga shall answer or otherwise plead on or before August 1, 2019. This preliminary order to respond does not, of course, preclude the Government from raising any objection or defense it may wish to present. Service upon the Illinois Attorney General, Criminal Appeals Bureau, 100 West Randolph, 12th Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60601, shall constitute sufficient service.

The response date ordered here is controlling. Any date that the Case Management/Electronic Case Filing ("CM/ECF") system should generate in the course of this litigation is a guideline only. --------

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this entire matter be REFERRED to a United States Magistrate Judge for disposition, as contemplated by Local Rule 72.2(b)(2) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), should all the parties consent to such a referral.

Petitioner is ADVISED of his continuing obligation to keep the Clerk of Court (and each opposing party) informed of any change in his whereabouts during the pendency of this action. This notification shall be done in writing and not later than seven days after a transfer or other change in address occurs. Failure to provide such notice may result in dismissal of this action. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 1, 2019

/s/ _________

NANCY J. ROSENSTENGEL

Chief U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Bell v. Varga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Jul 1, 2019
Case No. 19-cv-00680-NJR (S.D. Ill. Jul. 1, 2019)
Case details for

Bell v. Varga

Case Details

Full title:JESSIE BELL, #B81302, Petitioner, v. JOHN VARGA, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Date published: Jul 1, 2019

Citations

Case No. 19-cv-00680-NJR (S.D. Ill. Jul. 1, 2019)